Toward tailored care for families with multiple problems: A quasi-experimental study on effective elements of care.

Several effective interventions have been developed for families with multiple problems (FMP), but knowledge is lacking as to which specific practice and program elements of these interventions deliver positive outcomes. The aim of this study is to assess the degree to which practice and program elements (contents of and structure in which care is provided) contribute to the effectiveness of interventions for FMP in general and for subgroups with child and/or parental psychiatric problems, intellectual disabilities, or substance use. We performed a quasi-experimental study on the effectiveness of practice and program elements provided in attested FMP interventions. Using self-report questionnaires, we measured primary (child's internalizing and externalizing problems) and secondary (parental stress and social contacts) outcomes at the beginning, end, and three months thereafter. By means of Latent Profile Analysis, we identified groups of families receiving similar combinations of practice elements ("profiles"), and we calculated propensity scores. Next, we assessed how practice element profiles and program elements affected improvement in outcomes, and whether these effects were moderated by subgroup characteristics. We found three practice element profiles (explorative/supportive, action-oriented, and their combination), which were equally effective. Regarding program elements, effects were enhanced by more frequent telephone contact between visits and more frequent intervision. Effectiveness of practice and program elements varied for specific FMP subgroups. Variations in the content of care for FMP do not affect its effectiveness, but variations in the structure of the care do. This finding can help to further improve effective interventions.

Se han desarrollado varias intervenciones eficaces para familias multiproblemáticas, pero se sabe poco acerca de qué elementos específicos de la práctica y de los programas de estas intervenciones producen resultados positivos. El objetivo de este estudio es evaluar el grado en el cual los elementos de la práctica y de los programas (los contenidos de la asistencia y la estructura en la cual se presta) contribuyen a la eficacia de las intervenciones para familias multiproblemáticas en general, y para subgrupos de padres o hijos con problemas psiquiátricos, discapacidades intelectuales o consumo de sustancias. Realizamos un estudio cuasiexperimental sobre la eficacia de los elementos de la práctica y de los programas proporcionados en intervenciones certificadas para familias multiproblemáticas. Utilizando cuestionarios de autoinforme, medimos los resultados primarios (los problemas de interiorización y de exteriorización de los niños) y secundarios (estrés de los padres y contactos sociales) al comienzo, al final y tres meses a partir de entonces. Por medio del análisis de perfiles latentes, identificamos grupos de familias que recibían combinaciones similares de elementos de la práctica ("perfiles") y calculamos los puntajes de propensión. Después, evaluamos cómo los perfiles de los elementos de la práctica y los elementos del programa afectaron las mejoras en los resultados, y si estos efectos estuvieron moderados por las características de los subgrupos. Encontramos tres perfiles de elementos de la práctica (exploratorio/comprensivo, orientado a la acción y su combinación) que fueron igualmente eficaces. Con respecto a los elementos de los programas, los efectos mejoraron con el contacto telefónico más frecuente entre visitas y una intervisión más frecuente. La eficacia de los elementos de la práctica y de los programas varió según los subgrupos específicos de familias multiproblemáticas. Las variaciones en el contenido de la asistencia para las familias multiproblemáticas no afectan su eficacia, pero las variaciones en la estructura de la asistencia, sí. Estos resultados pueden ayudar a mejorar aún más las intervenciones eficaces.

[Child and youth care: ambulant and non-ambulant]. / Jugendhilfe: ambulant und stationär Plädoyer für ein Kontinuum.

The enhancement of community-based, ambulant care for children with serious behavioural problems (in German: "Ambulantisierung") implies supporting them as long as possible in their own family environment. One tries to avoid an out-of-home placement. This policy, strongly underlined during the last 20 years, shows merits but also raises questions. The emphasis on ambulant care and treatment was coupled with a decline in availability and appreciation of residential childcare services. Based on a theoretical model of family support and relevant empirical findings in the field we plead in favor of a complementary role for ambulatory and non-ambulatory services; both directed at lending professional support to children and families in need of care.

Placement history of foster children: a study of placement history and outcomes in long-term family foster care.

The files of 419 children in family foster care and kinship foster care were used in a retrospective longitudinal design study that examined their placement histories in child welfare. Significant associations were found between the number of placements on one hand, and the prevalence of attachment disorders, severity of behavioral problems, and breakdowns of new foster care placements on the other hand. It appears that a breakdown can be predicted to a certain extent, the implications of which are discussed.